![]() ![]() You know, I enjoyed Dead Space a great deal - so much I bought it on both PS3 and 360. They don't believe that niche market is enough to justify the opportunity cost. They aren't going to greenlight a "pure" survival horror game for the exact same reasons they are going to add more action to an existing franchise like SH. This is not a "win" for anybody.Ĭontent change decisions are made based on prevailing market conditions, so basically the whole argument that by not making this adulterated, corrupted version those resources are free to be redirected to something more to our taste is transparently false. Because if they don't make the thing, there's simply nothing to choose from. ![]() Because at least with the former scenario as gamers we have a CHOICE whether to support this revision or not. The bottom line is that if the people backing the project decide that in order to justify making a sequel they need to go more populist, its better generally for that to happen rather than for them simply not to bother. This dog-in-a-manger attitude where its acceptable to argue that just because something changes to follow a vision YOU don't share, then the whole thing deserves to fail really needs stamping on. Seriously, with the changes EA has simply been trying to make the game more popular and accessible. Play length is largely unrelated to production cost, so lets discard that particular straw-man right off the bat. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |